Got Facebook or Twitter?
Connect your FanBox to Facebook or Twitter & keepyour friends updated with all your activity on FanBox.
It's free and takes less than 10 seconds!
About this Author
You have rated this blog:
You have not yet rated this blog.
Rate it: Rate 1 Star Rate 2 Stars Rate 3 Stars Rate 4 Stars Rate 5 Stars
Click a
to change your rating
Tell others why you gave this rating (optional):
Tell others why you gave this rating (optional):
Tell others why you gave this rating (optional):
Common Wealth Games - 2010
Several English teams have delayed their arrival in New Delhi because of hygiene concerns!!!
Medias are eager to find mistakes of poor Indian Hygiene
Now go through the following snaps from UK.
Which country is this????
Real History of "Taj Mahal"
It is proved Taj Mahal is not a burial of Mumtaj, but, an ancient temple of Lord Shiva.
Sufficient proofs with many photos are below. Please go through the Text and Photos.
No one has ever challenged it, except, Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the
whole world has been duped.
In his book, “Taj Mahal: The True Story”, Prof.P.N.Oak says, Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb, but, an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) .
In the course of his research, Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from the then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial .
The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers. For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions.
Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term " Mahal " has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria . "The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.
Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani," he writes.
Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace .
The love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists. Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.
Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan.
Adult content and certain language are not permitted in premium blog posts.
Why? In order to fulfill our objective of helping you earn money, we have to abide by mobile carrier regulations.
In order to publish this post, please remove all offensive language and adult references, by modifying any yellow highlighted text. We apologize if our automated system flagged something it really shouldn’t have.

|
|
||